
The Immigration Court's active backlog of cases has surpassed one million, and the number is continuing to grow. The delay in immigration courts’ cases nationwide is likely being amplified by the Trump administration's degressive immigration stance and immigration policies. The increase may also be due to a surge in recent Central American migrant asylum seekers being placed into removal proceedings. August 2019 alone may present an additional 322,535 cases, totaling 1.3 million active backlogged cases. The Immigration court has its hands tied with policies going back and forth in the courts, and the ongoing situation involving Central American migrants may be exacerbating the issue . 384,000 new cases are made up mostly of these individuals, who are being told to "remain in Mexico,” and make up 9.9% of the new filings. USCA Facts comments on the growing asylum backlog, stating: "Unlike refugee seekers, who flee from their original homes and seek residency in a new country before arriving, asylum seekers flee their homes and seek residency in a new country upon arrival.” In the United States, asylum cases take two different forms. “Affirmative” asylum seekers actively apply with the Department of Homeland Security’s Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). “Defensive” asylum seekers are those seeking asylum once facing removal proceedings before the Department of Justice’s Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), also known as the “immigration court.” This type of asylum also includes cases of people caught at ports of entry or borders who cite that they cannot return to their home countries due to fear of persecution. https://usafacts.org/reports/asylum-border-immigration-court-backlog Going into October 2019, there is still a lot “up in the air” with respect to the Trump administration’s immigration, especially when it comes to those in removal proceedings. The “Remain In Mexico” policy was recently upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court, and immigration judges nationwide are dealing with mandatory quotas that they must fulfill. Attorney Ibrahim has observed that there are far too many individuals at the immigration court, but far too few judges able to accommodate the influx in cases. Still, there is positive news in other aspects of the immigration practice, with the recent news of USCIS announcing that it is accepting applications for deferred action, which we covered in a separate post. Nonetheless, we hope to see Congress, its sub-committees, and the Trump administration’s agencies push toward positive, impactful immigration reform to help alleviate the court backlog.
WRITTEN BY
Michael G. Ibrahim, Esq.
Founder & Principal Attorney
Ibrahim Law Office
12+
YRS EXP
3,000+
CASES
150+
REVIEWS
3
LANGUAGES
Contact Us
CONTACT THE OFFICE
(312) 767-8611
info@ibralaw.com
1655 S. Blue Island Ave., Suite 300
Chicago, IL 60608

"If you are looking for an immigration lawyer who gets results without wasting time, look no further. Michael is extremely knowledgeable and proactive. My case was handled with the utmost precision and within the expected timeframe. I am very impressed with his expertise and fast turnaround."
— Verified Google Review
150+ 5-Star Reviews on Google
OUR PRACTICE AREAS
More Immigration Blogs
About the Author
Michael G. Ibrahim, Esq.
Founder & Principal Attorney — Ibrahim Law Office
EDUCATION
DePaul University College of Law
J.D., 2013
Certificate in Public Interest Law
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
B.A. Political Science & International Studies, 2010
Benjamin Hooks Public Interest Law Scholar
Editor, Journal for Social Justice — DePaul University
BAR ADMISSIONS
Supreme Court of Illinois
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
U.S. District Court – N.D. Illinois
U.S. District Court – E.D. Wisconsin
U.S. District Court – E.D. Michigan
U.S. District Court – S.D. Indiana
MEMBERSHIPS
American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA)
Illinois State Bar Association
Assyrian American Bar Association
LANGUAGES
English
Spanish
Assyrian Aramaic
Hear From Our
Clients